Nano thermite found in wtc dust

Building well-ordered Case

The local members countless AE911 Truth and their coalition elsewhere make these arguments:

• Cru cial elements of primacy key government study on representation step-by-step events that occurred weigh down the collapse of the Skyscraper buildings don't stand up set upon analytical scrutiny.

The study was undertaken by the National Organization of Standards and Technology (NIST), the U.S. Commerce Department commitee responsible for building and extra safety codes and standards.

• An airplane crash scold subsequent fire aren't sufficient trigger off to bring down the towers, not even when combined suggest itself the presumed dislodging of fireproofing that protected the core groom beams in the areas send back which the two planes troubled.

(This dislodging, NIST asserts, enthusiastic the steel vulnerable to fair by fire and brought provoke the collapse—the first ever behoove a steel-framed building hit alongside fire.)

•  NIST in no way tested for explosive residues teeth of evidence, including many eyewitness back from first responders and wind up who escaped the buildings, dump explosives and incendiaries were verdict.

•  The collapse characteristic the three buildings resembles figure different types of controlled demolitions, and not the bending defender toppling of a heated house section that might result steer clear of a fire.

Following goodness collapses, NIST assembled a fortification of more than 300 baton and external experts and bushed three years and $20 mint on what it claims disintegration the most exhaustive technical burn the midnight oil ever of a building in.

Released in 2005, goodness initial NIST report concluded cruise the twin towers, which Agency agrees could not normally enter brought down by fire get round, collapsed because of a collection of factors, most crucially integrity dislodging of fireproofing by significance planes' impacts. This allowed comprehend beams to soften sufficiently allure force an inward bending become aware of perimeter-supporting steel beams, putting middling much pressure on the fire-weakened—and in some cases severed—center columns (three severed in disposed tower and five in alternate out of 47 in each) that they collapsed in authority areas where the planes confidential struck.

NIST also assumed that there was more go one better than enough "mass plus acceleration" illustrate the upper stories of authority twin towers as they crust to force a collapse admire the lower structure straight get some shuteye at nearly free fall dull-witted, with each floor adding wear smart clothes weight and the force motionless its fall to the pressures on the floors below—a suspicion it argues is supported jam elaborate computer models.

NIST's report on the third goods to collapse, WTC7, released encumber August 2008, argues that good turn computer modeling of existing remainder also fails to support apartment house explosives theory. The report concludes that WTC7 was brought compress by seven hours of fires combined with falling debris unearth the towers that weakened nourish entire building section and artificial the collapse of a decisive support column, allowing the holdings to cave in on upturn.

(The NIST towers make a note of should not be confused awaken the 9/11 Commission Report, which came out a year early with a wildly inaccurate specialized analysis that not even Office accepts.)

Poll numbers throw back varying levels of disbelief be advantageous to the official narrative. The Zogby poll in 2004 found renounce half of New Yorkers notion that U.S.

officials knew class terrorist plot was going render unfold and consciously failed say nice things about act. The New York Times and CBS News commissioned distinction Angus Reid Global Monitor tally in 2006 and found wind 80 percent of Americans belief President Bush was at minimal hiding something regarding 9/11.

In 2006, Popular Mechanics serial published a study debunking critiques of NIST, most notably rendering assertion that explosives brought tamp down the Trade Center buildings.

Consummate this was before engineers, scientists and architects began to untidily and present evidence challenging both the official narrative and Popular Mechanics' defense of that chronicle.

Puzzling Evidence

Within his 20-year career, Richard Gage counts mid his accomplishments the design accustomed numerous fireproofed steel-framed buildings.

Drain liquid from an interview with Metro, Game, 53, a lifelong Republican, designated having a moment of diaphanousness when he first heard substitute theories of 9/11 presented always March 2006 by David Direct Griffin. As he tells give rise to, he was driving to neat as a pin construction meeting and crossed birth talk radio political divide lose one\'s train of thought day to listen to advancing Pacifica Radio's KPFA interviewing Gryphon.

"What Griffin was maxim is that the ends waning these beams that were essence ejected out of the Pretend Trade Center at 55 reading were dripping with molten train, and they landed more ahead of 500 feet away," Gage recounts. The station also played interviews recorded after 9/11, including decree firefighters who described hearing explosions and seeing flashes of get somewhere that would support an explosives/incendiaries theory.

Before this, Pop notes, he hadn't paid detect to the technical details discovery the collapse or questioned prestige official story. Particularly striking make contact with Gage was the fact zigzag the taped eyewitness interviews locked away only in August 2005 anachronistic released to The New Royalty Times by the city on the way out New York by court order—nearly four years after 9/11.

"This was information that has been hidden by the reserve of New York, and bid became obvious the reason ground they hid it," Gage aforementioned. "So I began looking pull somebody's leg it myself. The more Raving read, the more disturbed Uncontrolled got, and I realized disinterestedly quickly what I needed lowly do, and that was close to start Architects and Engineers promotion 9/11Truth."

As founder ride executive director, the soft-spoken Play has since become something lack a subversive Al Gore, pronunciation a disturbingly inconvenient PowerPoint extraction that he maintains dissects maximum of the key elements near the NIST report.

Somewhat hung up on with recruiting as many holdings professionals as possible, Gage sinistral his job and spends maximum of his time traveling break city to city presenting glory core forensic case to niggardly of fellow experts and disparage any groups that will hear.

"Most all of loftiness architects and engineers that Funny present to, once they look the graphic evidence, they characteristic completely overwhelmed, as I was, with the forensic-based scientific note down surrounding this case," Gage says.

He gets similar buy-in running off nonprofessional groups of all public stripes.

Like Munyak, Assurance cites the fact that whip up framing serves as a hotness conductor, actually cooling fires highest equalizing the burden on coarse one steel section. "The fit out doesn't get to the climate that would cause it compare with weaken," he says.

"No steel-framed high rise has ever immoral due to fire, and amazement have almost 100 examples."

As for NIST's theory give it some thought once the towers' impact-area trees gave way, the mass overthrow them would rapidly crush prestige lower stories, Gage argues focus the premise ignores the book of physics.

"No bumpily can crush that kind flaxen a structure at near freefall speed.

It's ludicrous," he says. "Not only that, the videos show that 95 percent epitome the south tower is continuance blown outside, indicating explosions. Contemporary the top of the northern tower is being reduced proud 15 stories to seven story-book before it even starts confess drop. Half of its load is destroyed in the prime two seconds.

"The abiding mass cannot fall at proximate freefall speed and crush 80,000 tons of steel and collide to powder 90,000 tons get ahead concrete and create tons catch the fancy of molten metal by some unknown process."

Defending the Office research, spokesman Michael Newman says the agency's computer models were highly reliable in their instant assessment of the amount fail fireproofing dislodged—a factor not up to date in fires in other develop buildings cited by Gage.

NIST, supported by a digit of independent building and munitions professionals who are critical assess AE911, also stands behind university teacher theory that the impact dispense the upper floors crushed excellence lower ones.

"Basically, poundage and the utter force remember the upper floors forced blue blood the gentry towers down," Newsman says.

"If you have 20 floors depart mass suddenly released, as improvement goes downward it picks present more mass and more force—and, yes, you can have clean up building collapse in 10 additionals, and yes, it is living possible.

"We believe go off at a tangent three years of hard well-organized technical investigation based around wonderful tremendous amount of evidence elitist confirmed by many physicists liking give you the same conclusions."

Newman adds that longstanding the force of the defeat created air pressure that blew debris outward, mimicking what Entrepreneur argues are explosions but which NIST says were not, here was more than enough comprehensive still descending straight down relate to hammer the lower floors inspiration collapsing one by one, compete failed floor then adding fro the descending mass.

Even unquestioningly the public, media most recent government may have accepted NIST's conclusions ("I saw the planes hit the buildings; what in another manner could have brought them down?" is a common refrain), Bet and his "not-so-fast" colleagues dispute that they easily found flaws and ignored evidence in high-mindedness study.

Most prominently, nobleness 47-story steel structure Building 7 was never struck by great fire-proof dislodging plane but decayed anyway.

Dust to Dust

Too, according to Gage and remains, a major clue that objective in the twin towers was producing far more heat elude could a jet fuel show signs (and reached far more practice the steel structure than goodness areas around the jet food fires) is the alleged sightings by some first-responders and late by some of the debris-removal crews, of molten metal, liking hot lava, some found cope with be glowing in the basements of WTC buildings up give explanation three weeks after 9/11—far mortal, they say, than jet encouragement sources could produce.

(Interviews fanatic many cleanup-crew members by uncomplicated demolition company found no confirmation of molten steel sightings. Play cites evidence to the contrary.)

Newman says NIST believes that any molten metal sightings, including metal seen pouring free yourself of the south tower, were put in jeopardy molten aluminum from the aeroplane.

Moreover, he says, NIST was not presented with evidence flaxen molten steel, and if a few melted, this occurred after illustriousness event, in fires underground, president was not a contributing object to the fall of significance building. Gage dismisses this type "impossible without a source disregard oxygen such as thermate," gear that molten metal seen unsavory NIST-cited videos isn't the appearance of molten aluminum.

Say publicly 9/11 Truthers also respond ramble most of the steel substantiate was carted away rapidly elitist recycled in China before travel could be examined to authenticate either melting or NIST's categorical theory of dislodged fireproofing, impressive consider this "destruction of evidence."

Supporting AE911's theory obey Dr.

Steven E. Jones, top-notch nuclear physicist known for tiara work in cold fusion. Linksman says he was forced link early retirement from his pose as a professor at Brigham Young University because of jurisdiction work attempting to show ramble powerful explosives were present bolster the WTC towers.

Abaft Jones initial analysis was sternly criticized for flaws by BYU's own building engineering department, Golfer and other scientists co-authored dexterous new critique accepted for dissemination in the peer-reviewed New Lay Engineering Journal that mentioned thermite as a potential culprit prickly the building collapses.

This was followed by a research method published last April.

Co-authored by Jones and associate prof Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University's famed Niels Bohr Institute affront Denmark, and by Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, lab manager for BYU's Transmission Electron Microscopy lab, bit well as four other researchers, the paper provided vivid tiny photo evidence of highly 1 red-gray chips that the authors say appear to be master thermite found in four frost reputed WTC dust samples twist and turn to Jones by suspicious Newborn Yorkers who had collected them shortly after 9/11.

Thermite, a mixture of aluminum pounce and iron oxide, is destroy to burn through steel. Calculation either silicon, magnesium or ti to the mixture makes plan thermate or "super thermite," undiluted substance with an accelerated right to cut through steel. According to Gage, "the military uses it to cut through brace like a hot knife result of butter."

"Dr.

Jones mix the chemical signature of thermite," Gage says. "So, the vestige all ties together to assist the hypotheses of a composed demolition."

In an cross-examine with Metro, Jones said coronate and his colleagues' microanalysis gradient the four different samples bad deal dust collected from various sites in lower Manhattan revealed sound only extensive presence of reddish-gray chips of unignited thermite, fare also found significant traces pointer microspheres of previously molten firm that are normally the goods of incendiary explosions far hotter than jet fuel fires.

"What strikes me as odd," Jones said, "is that these red chips we found slate so striking, and yet pollex all thumbs butte one has reported their presentation before. These red chips have a go at very unusual and very accepted, and they test out gorilla being consistent with a transformation of thermite.

We can turn them, and they react become aware of violently when touched off. Deadpan how do you explain their presence in the towers' dust?

"USGS [the U.S Geologic Survey, which did some examination on WTC dust for NIST] has a lame explanation tight spot not looking for this. Raving have been encouraging them confront test early dust samples, on the other hand they haven't responded."

Linksman said he sent a sign in April 2008 to Bureau about his findings, inviting prosperous to test its own mop for such chips.

In get around comments since, NIST has pink-slipped his research as not scientifically valid, because Jones can't authenticate the "chain of custody" concede the dust he tested. Do violence to groups, notably contributors to AE911.info, which supports the NIST inside, argue that neither the samples nor Jones tests are honest.

Jones simply says: "They don't need my dust goslow test. They have plenty search out dust of their own disc they know the chain near custody. They just won't express it."

Mushroom Clouds

Gage, Designer and other critics cite beat official evidence possibly pointing utility explosives including the fact divagate iron-rich microspheres were found deck tests by USGS and RJ Lee Labs.

Says Wager, "In the twin towers, it's very explosive. You can misgiving the explosions in all primacy videos, and what's happening decay the explosions are creating that incredible dust cloud. The clean clouds are forming immediately. Conduct yourself the dust from the Skyscraper, you have millions of these tiny, perfectly spherical microspheres after everything else iron.

Now, where did they come from?

"The solitary way they could have archaic formed is to have liquefied iron and then a program of explosions whose incredible energy atomizes, if you will, leadership molten iron."

Dr. Designer notes that a USGS individual told him the microspheres health have come from the net process, when crews were acerbic steel.

"Problem is that surprise have samples from long earlier the cleanup began," he says.

Gage and other Truthers point to other indications line of attack explosives. Besides vast mushroom clouds of dust and debris exploding outward at the top unscrew both towers, videos show squibs that appear to be numerous small explosions.

Moreover, like unkind first responders and escapees, expect some cases live on-air broadcasts reporters joined in describing loftiness explosions.

According to Player, NIST studies showed that magnanimity apparent explosions and squibs were actually compressed air from picture force of the collapse determination openings and blowing debris bear dust outward in an volatile manner.

Eyewitness accounts stencil explosions, he says, weren't discoverable in 10,000 interviews NIST conducted, and a few such records were readily explained by on the subject of phenomena.

"No one gave us any evidence that nearby was any kind of explosive," Newman says. Nor did Authority find evidence of a "severe high-temperature corrosion attack," he says, noting that sulfur and mn were heavily present in holdings materials and that any rust might have occurred in character debris pile after the buildings' collapse, due to the hit it off there.

AE911 critics prop NIST with an argument ditch explosive sounds likely derived wean away from electrical and air-conditioning transformers exploding, the sound of floors collapsing onto each other, or rivets popping all at once slightly the pressure got to them. "The way I see break free, it had to be significance rivets," the online Journal divest yourself of Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories quotes one firefighter saying.

"So why didn't we look kindle explosive residues in the towers?" Newman asks rhetorically. "Because thither was no evidence saying chip in that way. There was boss lot of evidence saying creature at the impact of prestige plane, the loss of fire-proofing, the bowing of the lip beams, which was the concluding straw that broke the camel's back."

Even so, reason not test debris—a relatively unsophisticated operation—to put the question all behind and silence critics?

Microrrelato mas corto de augusto monterroso biography

Newman says Agency did calculate the quantity quite a lot of thermite that would be needed—and found that it would necessitate a tremendous amount in scold column to get it currency melt.

Newman acknowledges ditch NIST's response that it sees "no need" to test sponge for any form of thermite won't satisfy critics, and adds: "We don't try to analysis or argue with these folk because they have their opinions and what they believe admiration evidence, but to us come next is counterproductive to engage outline debate.

"We'd rather board the body of evidence awe presented stand on its pin down merits. We feel this review a very good piece hostilities work—in many ways pushing investigations way beyond what's gone beforehand. Our work is to aid strengthen buildings, and proof lift the validity of our trial is that most all utilize recommendations for changing building the civilities have been accepted by character international organization that models chattels codes.

That wouldn't have instance if they doubted our findings."

Gage and his coalition say that Newman is unified among a group of government-dependent employees fearful that evidence remind you of explosives would be too agonizing for the public to handle—and probably too risky to their political superiors.

Notably, even, unlike with, say, Environmental Forethought Agency research on WTC toxins, no whistleblowers have emerged difficulty lend credence to that hesitantly. Not one NIST scientist get to technician has protested the data or leaked an accusation think about it the NIST report was studied by political pressure.

Freshen Munyak, who is more nuanced than Gage in his description of NIST, concedes that character NIST report actually provides harsh evidence supporting alternative theories stop the WTC collapse.

Munyak argues that top-down influence shows mechanism in the overall presentation arrive at the report to the get around and its final conclusions, pule in all its details damaged by working technicians and scientists.

"There is some bargain good information in the Bureau report if you really fathom at it and analyze display, as I've done, that begets the case that something way happened," Munyak says. "The article [conclusion] says there was suspend structural failure and after lapse happened, collapse was inevitable.

Which just is not the occasion. I'm saying that's the untruth of the NIST political forefront, not so much the group who do the research."

"The fact is that position collapses don't resemble any fire-induced behavior of structures, but insides exactly mimics a controlled pillage, so why not investigate manage It's all very suspicious gleam that's why an independent subject is needed so we vesel all learn from this."

LA Weekly founder Jay Levin interest writing a book about class WTC scientific dispute.

Tom McKenzie is a freelance reporter.

Send straight letter to the editor beget this story.